Raydium legacy pools exploited

June 10, Raydium's deprecated AMM V3 pools were exploited, draining $1.34M in 150,177 RAY, 5,603 SOL, and 893,700 USDC from five inactive pools.

avatar

$MAT /USDT | Massive Energy Compression

The macro view on $MAT is looking incredibly clean. After printing an absolute moonshot to 0.3000, it has spent weeks building a rock-solid floor at 0.0577. It is maintaining a beautiful higher low structure above the 0.0327 origin level. This extended consolidation has squeezed the MACD lines right to the zero axis meaning volatility compression is reaching its limit. Expecting a violent breakout to the upside once this range breaks.


#GENIUS Act stablecoin oversight

#Polygon's Giugliano upgrade

#Shibarium transaction volume spikes

#Raydium legacy pools exploited

#GENIUS Act state certification debate


$KLINK

$LIKE

$CTA

$ORBS

avatar

🚨Crypto’s next black swan might be AI-powered hackers. Immunefi’s CEO just called it a coming “vulnerability apocalypse.” And he’s not exaggerating. Frontier AI models are dramatically lowering the cost and time needed to discover smart contract exploits. What used to take skilled researchers weeks now takes models hours. That changes the entire risk curve of DeFi: • More attack surface • Faster exploit discovery • Smaller teams needed • Higher expected frequency of hacks If AI scales offense faster than defense, TVL becomes a melting ice cube. This isn’t FUD. It’s structural. Protocols that don’t integrate AI into auditing and monitoring will get selected out. While others sell you hype or farm engagement, I focus on where the real asymmetric risks are. If you’re not following yet, you’re missing the edge 📈

avatar

I’m glad to see Spark CEO @hexonaut publicly addressing this issue. With the launch of Mythos, the cost for hackers to find code vulnerabilities has dropped sharply, especially in large codebases—issues that previously existed but were hard to quickly identify are now being exposed much faster. This is a concern widely shared by industry participants and market players. In response, Sam said: For most core DeFi smart contracts, the codebases are typically small enough, critical enough, and have undergone long-term audits, real-world testing, and community oversight. Traditional security methods—including audits, formal verification, bug bounties, rate limiting, timelocks, and multi-sig governance delays—still provide a high level of security confidence. The real amplified risks stem more from large-scale infrastructure, complex backend systems, permission management, and off-chain components. Once these systems are compromised, the attack surface rapidly expands. I agree with his perspective. Compared to newer systems, well-established DeFi smart contracts that have been battle-tested over many years carry relatively lower inherent risk. If DeFi can emerge from this wave of challenges with a stronger focus on minimizing code, minimizing permissions, implementing rate limits, using timelocks, and enforcing modular isolation to contain risks within manageable bounds, it could actually become stronger than before.

avatar

Shout out to @captainjack125 for this banger thread on Wanchain. We believe that when it comes to DeFi and bridging, there should never be compromises in security/decentralization. That's been the secret sauce behind our operations for over 8 years 🛡️

avatar

⚠️ Raydium suffers a $1.34 million exploit in its legacy AMM program; treasury will cover losses Raydium confirmed an exploit in its legacy AMM V3 program, resulting in the theft of approximately $1.34 million in assets. The attack targeted inactive liquidity pools and was enabled by insufficient validation in legacy contracts, allowing the attacker to bypass ratio controls. Incident Details The hack affected only retired and inactive liquidity pools, including RAY-SOL, USDC-RAY, and SRM-RAY. According to the Raydium team, the vulnerable code belonged to a discontinued version of the protocol that had not been in use since 2021 and had already been removed from the official interface. Developers emphasized that active platform users were unaffected, as the exploit was limited to legacy contracts no longer part of Raydium’s active ecosystem. Market Reaction and Team Response Despite the incident, the native token RAY demonstrated resilience, rising over 2% in the hours following the announcement. The project treasury confirmed it will cover the full cost of losses to compensate affected parties. As a preventive measure, the Raydium team has initiated a comprehensive and independent security audit of all active smart contracts deployed on the Solana mainnet. The incident underscores the risks associated with legacy contracts that remain deployed on the blockchain even after they are no longer actively used. Summary Raydium suffered a $1.34 million exploit in its legacy AMM V3 program, affecting only inactive liquidity pools from a protocol version discontinued since 2021. Active users were not impacted. The project treasury will cover all losses, and the team has launched a full security audit of its active smart contracts. Despite the incident, the RAY token remained stable and rose over 2% following the announcement. Important Notice This information is based on Raydium’s official announcement and on-chain reports published on June 11, 2026. It does not constitute investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making any financial decisions.

avatar

there was a time when the highest yield was enough to get attention. now people want to know what sits behind it before they commit capital. @alturax reflects that change. the conversation is no longer limited to returns, it includes audits, insured vaults, established integrations, and the quality of the framework producing those returns. that shift says a lot about where defi is today. confidence is no longer built from numbers alone. it comes from understanding how a system is designed to operate when conditions become less predictable. that is where trust becomes part of the value itself. not as a replacement for yield, but as something that gives yield a stronger foundation.

avatar

While the socials have been silent for a moment. our team keeps on delivering. @xerberus v4 is just around the corner. keep notifications on, and let's keep making DeFI safer together!

avatar

DeFi TVL just dropped below $70B. First time since February 2024. Before the panic: put it in context. 2022 ATH: $175B 2023 bear bottom: $37B 2026 peak (Jan): $155B Today: ~$68B That's -56% from the 2026 peak. It's ugly. But the $37B floor held twice already. This isn't structural collapse — it's a drawdown inside a known range. What's actually happening: ETF outflows 3 consecutive weeks. DAT inflows at 18-month lows. Institutional money risk-off after the June CPI print. Capital isn't rotating — it's leaving. The $70B level now tells you everything: If it holds as support → accumulation zone, DeFi protocols are oversold vs revenue. If it breaks and trends toward $50B → the 2025 recovery narrative is fully unwound. TVL dropping below $70B is not the signal. Whether it bounces here is.

avatar

Most underrated metric in a bear market: Revenue. Top 10 DeFi protocols by LTM revenue — all under $1B market cap: solana:METvsvVRapdj9cFLzq4Tr43xK4tAjQfwX76z3n6mWQL — $56.4M AAVE — $21.9M AERO — $21.5M ATH — $16.0M CAKE — $13.0M POL — $12.5M (+768% LTM growth) LIT — $11.3M JUP — $10.2M ORE — $9.6M LDO — $6.6M Two numbers that stand out: Meteora P/S = 0.9x. Market cap $53.5M. LTM revenue $56.4M. The protocol earns more than it's worth. That's either a screaming buy or a revenue sustainability question. Ore Protocol P/S = 0.8x. $35M MC vs $43M annualized revenue. Same situation. Everything else is trading 14–64x revenue. POL's +768% LTM growth is real — but at 64.6x P/S, it's pricing in years of execution. In a bear market, price shows fear. Revenue shows whether the business actually exists. MET and ORE exist. The market hasn't priced it in yet.

avatar

The crypto industry is experiencing a real security crisis due to advanced AI models. Immunefi’s CEO confirms that the proliferation of new AI technologies is behind the sharp rise in DeFi protocol breaches, exposing critical vulnerabilities in decentralized financial systems.