BRO actually said “𝐑𝐋𝐔𝐒𝐃 isn’t competing with 𝐗𝐑𝐏.” If that’s 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐄, then 70% of it shouldn’t sit on the ETH chain; the entire project should HAVE BEEN on the 𝐗𝐑𝐏𝐋. 𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐇𝐀𝐏𝐒 the reason 70% of RLUSD isn’t “on the XRPL” is that he recognizes there isn’t enough REAL usage. $XRP wouldn’t NEED promotion in a train station like a meme coin if it were truly utilized. I don’t see Solana advertised on the train, nor Quant, and those tokens have reached three digits multiple times. Confidence would likely emerge in compelling RLUSD use on the XRPL if RIPPLE knew it WOULD BE adopted and informed users: “hey, the only way you will use this is on the XRPL.” Clearly, they did not follow that approach for a reason, because after eleven years, other options were used instead.

$XRP is at the heart of everything we do!! RIPPLE CEO! https://t.co/1gfHOd6qH7

Crypto SEC witness essentially said that Ripple bought $XRP near major announcements to foster the impression of significance, encouraging OTHER market participants to invest. Oh, perhaps that CLEARLY explains why holders purchased and retained positions over the past 5–10 years, clearly expecting gains from those partnership announcements. https://t.co/katq2oCv1g

How could $XRP holders fail to understand what they were purchasing, given all the partnerships over the past “ 11 years” in which XRP was “supposed” to be used but was intentionally not used, merely pumped and dumped for 11 years? Holders were CLEARLY expecting REAL PROFITS from ALL THOSE partnerships and from the stream of empty claims coming from RIPPLE/BRAD to everyone. RIPPLE CEO stated, “XRP serves as the foundation for our strategy.” Next, assign 70% of RLUSD to ETH. That remark seemed a blatant insult, compounded by bots undermining holders who KEPT and maintained their positions due to expectations that $XRP would feature in all those partnerships with Ripple over the past 11 years. Every 97 almost ONE HUNDRED amendments have passed and has been approved for over a decade yet remains unused. That result has generated many missed opportunities for holders to diversify and earn real money while observing other tokens surge in value within the sector where they are ACTUALLY USED, which explains the price gaps.

My goodness, just wait until I show what Larson was saying. It is absolutely disgusting. The SEC was correct in pursuing Ripple, especially after what I observed. We all assumed it was wrong, but once you actually see it, you will know the truth. Everything is in the SEC case documentation; just expect to be infuriated. I was unaware of this before, but now I am. Someone brought it to my attention, and it is actually insane. This returns to my point that XRP has only 24,000 daily active addresses, which is garbage. There is no way the price can rise with that. For instance, Solana has over 2.7 million daily active addresses, and consider the price. Just know that all of you who overhype XRP hopium will be cooked. Now, did $XRP get mentioned by the IMF, BIS, and World Bank? Yes, it did, which is good and explains why the IMF must take over, since people engaged in disgusting garbage that destroyed XRP’s price over all these years.

Now everyone claims to have sparked the “oh I started the trend about XRP price after 11 years” narrative—you didn’t begin saying that until VALE noted he began the trend eight months ago. Now, eight months later, all of you want to act as if you brought it to light. I swear these people are pathetic. After all, we recognize that EVERNORTH’s CEO himself did not begin discussing XRP price being dislodged from adoption until after MY intense outburst. Long before the imitators and aspiring mimics began their imitation. EVERNORTH offered nothing about the price until I spoke. So stop your complaints, you frustrated critics. Back off already. I set the direction. I did the same with Brian Armstrong regarding him wanting “stablecoin yield” for his 30% fees. Then those accounts copied from nowhere. That is what these cowards do. There is absolutely no originality here, which explains why none of those CEOs discussed the XRP price until after VALE did. Please avoid being copycats. Get off my jock. CEOs didn’t give a fuck about what any of you irrelevant clowns said. But they did with VALE.

Notice how, since August, I have noted XRP price delays; now the entire space seems to be awakening. I have my receipts 🧾. I take the lead, and others consistently follow. No one posted about this topic repeatedly until VALE did it first. That effort was genuine—not from newcomers who arrived in 2024. You were absent eleven years ago. Please be sthu.

$XRP shouldn’t have needed to be promoted with a subway train station and a college football team if it was really being used. Ripple’s CEO literally said in 2018 that “massive institutional liquidity” meant the number of banks “would scale with a magnitude” of dozens coming to XRP. That CLEARLY wasn’t the case and CLEARLY WHY people HELD ON for sooooooo long. YET Here we are 14 years later being promoted by a “college football team and a subway train station.” Go ahead , GO NUTS now cause I’m stating TRUTH FACT.

RIPPLE CEO 2026 NOW 1. “ ANYBODY WHO DOESN’T THINK XRP IS AT THE HEART OF WHAT RIPPLE DOES IS MISSING THE BUG PICTURE “ 2. “ WE WANT TO SOLVE THE CUSTOMER PROBLEM EVEN IF THATS THROUGH RLUSD OR FIAT “ NEW REPORTER RESPONSE - “ WHAT IS IT THAT XRP CAN DO THAT THE RLUSD STABLE COIN CANNOT DO “ YEA BRAD? DID YOU CATCH THAT?! JUST LOOK AT THE REPORTERS FACE WHEN SHE ASKED THAT. YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS UP. WHEN SMART PEOPLE NOTICE SOMETHING FUNNY THEY QUESTION IT.

RIPPLE CEO GETS COOKED BY NEW REPORTER! FINALLY ASKED THE QUESTION!! “ institutional demand has arrived and you keep talking about RLUSD and RIPPLE expanding “ BUT WHAT ABOUT XRP?!!!!!!!! https://t.co/CQ2kW1Gimu