Should I? A Bitaxe Gamma does sound good as additional miner.

This is why I keep Bit-Block as simple as it is. No new features, only adjustable and qimplified policy settings. The more features introduced, the more attack vectors are being opened up. Keep Bitcoin money. Keep it stupidly simple.

Do not share false hope for a good stacking Bitcoin on the cheap-time.

And 6 years later he's being touted as the Bitcoin president..

A short rebuttal: - ETF's were never Bitcoin. - A diversified portfolio has always been a smart move. - People pivoting to AI is not bad for Bitcoin. Both stand on their own merit.

Safety advisory notice. Upgrade your Electrum wallet to avoid potential theft!

Like any airdropped Crypto (as that's what it is.. Crypto.. not Bitcoin), will we see sell-offs as people dump for quick money.

As a holder of Bitcoin, I see no reason to split and dump XBT. I have always held my Bitcoin in self-custody pre-fork. Not going to create more liquidity for a shitcoin with centralized development and scammy antics.

Agreed. True ossification implies no singular reference implementation. Just a diverse ecosystem of various clients and miners using them

Then I'll make sure Bit-Block will keep on allowing support for old addresses. Client software which allows noderunning should preserve network legacy. There's too much focus on "add new stuff" and few on "let's preserve legacy".