$INJ vs. $SUI! both are strong layer 1 ecosystems, but my conviction is with INJ. here's why. ➜ technology: Sui has its Move-based object architecture and demonstrated 40M TPS. Injective brings EVM and CosmWasm support through MultiVM. ➜ DeFi: Sui has over $460M in TVL and $429M+ in stablecoin liquidity. Injective is building finance-native infrastructure for onchain markets. ➜ RWA: Injective has recorded $6.8B+ in RWA trading volume, spanning equities, forex and commodities. ➜ tokenomics: INJ has a 100M maximum supply, with community buybacks and permanent burns. SUI has a 10B supply cap and scheduled token releases. ➜ institutional finance: Both are pursuing institutional adoption, but Injective's focus on regulated financial markets gives it a thesis I find particularly compelling. i respect what SuiNetwork is building, but my conviction is stronger with @injective. my pick: $INJ. which one are you backing?
you've been hearing about the $INJ ETF everywhere, but what exactly is INJC? let me break it down simply. 1. what is INJC? INJC is the ticker for Canary Capital's staked INJ ETF, designed to trade on Nasdaq and give investors exposure to INJ through a traditional brokerage account. 2. how does it work? the fund holds actual INJ tokens on behalf of its shareholders, with @BitGo serving as custodian. 3. what makes it different? the fund aims to stake up to 90% of its INJ holdings. the net staking rewards are reinvested into the fund, potentially increasing the amount of INJ backing its shares over time. 4. do investors need a crypto wallet? no. investors can buy and sell INJC shares through a participating brokerage, subject to availability. no personal crypto wallet or validator setup is required. 5. does buying INJC mean you own $INJ directly? no. you own shares in the fund, not tokens you can transfer onchain, stake yourself, or use to vote on Injective governance. why am i paying attention? INJC creates another potential route for traditional investors to gain exposure to INJ, while incorporating staking into a familiar investment product. more access could help broaden participation, although it doesn't guarantee inflows or a higher INJ price. the bigger picture? @injective is building financial infrastructure onchain while its native asset gains another bridge to traditional markets. gNinja ct.
$INJ with the market cap of $HYPE 🔥 do you think it's possible? https://t.co/7GaqQJgNzp
summary of the @injective community buyback! - 24,006 $inj burnt - 7,295,039 $inj burnt in total - participants in the burn got 20.46% ROI - almost everyone who participated got tokenized stocks - and thank God, i got $RKLB this time. good morning, you all! 🥂 https://t.co/iC7YpdZzPy
