People's favorite collections don't reach the prices they expected, and the first thing they do is blame the sellers. If you're trading, there's one concept you really need to understand: the law of supply and demand. It doesn't matter how many people are selling or at what price. If there's enough demand, buyers will keep absorbing the listings and the floor will rise anyway. A collection's price isn't determined by the people selling it. It's determined by the demand for it. Stop blaming people for selling "too cheap." That $200 profit might not matter to you, but for a lot of people in this space, it's a meaningful amount of money.

When you keep running without stopping, after a while you forget why you're running. Remind yourself from time to time why you're running.

. @Frag_Growth 's artist has been getting FUD since yesterday for moving the mint funds to a CEX. This has to be a joke. What did you expect him to do with the money? Of course he's going to transfer it to his exchange account. It's his money now. This isn't a utility project. It's an art collection. In an art collection, the artist makes art, and people buy it because they like the art. It's that simple. I keep seeing people say the project will die if the artist doesn't "do something." That's honestly hilarious. The artist's job is to make art. That's it. I think most people in this space should stay away from art collections.

Looking at what’s been said about @bonk_inu over the past few days, I think there’s an important detail about what happened that’s being overlooked. There’s no question that this was a serious governance failure, and the community has every right to demand stronger controls. But the attack targeted the BonkDAO treasury; the $BONK token contract wasn’t compromised, and user wallets weren’t affected. And the BONK ecosystem is much bigger than a single DAO treasury. BONKTrade has processed over $1B in volume in 2026 alone and BONKbot continues to record over $1M in daily activity. One governance failure doesn’t make what happened any less serious, but it also doesn’t erase the ecosystem BONK has spent years building overnight. It’s simply inaccurate to treat a security incident involving the DAO treasury as if the entire BONK ecosystem was hacked. These are two completely different things. If we’re going to criticize something, let’s at least criticize the right thing.

we're at the bottom... we're literally at the bottom now. monthly NFT volume is at an all-time low. from here, it's either death or a comeback. but if you ask me, I think we're getting very close to the days when NFTs start rising again. https://t.co/Wjzad2XBDw

Today I went to enroll my child in preschool. The registration form had a section asking what I do for work. I had to leave it blank. The hardest part of what I do is trying to explain it to people.

Yeah, NFTs are dead.

I warned you about this too. As you can see, it only took a little panic for both NFTs and meme coins on Robinhood to completely collapse. The only NFT collections I'm holding on RH are @OnChainHoodies and @pyopyopyo410 OnChainHoodies: The first fully onchain NFT collection on Robinhood. pyopyopyo: A collection with unique art that doesn't resemble any other project. I'll be completely honest. If these two collections fail to perform and can't establish themselves as long-term projects, then I'd say the Robinhood NFT story is over.

think people are underestimating how quickly NFTs can snap out of a bear market once capital starts rotating further out the risk curve Market caps are tiny. Liquidity is incredibly thin. It takes very little capital to move prices once demand returns Meanwhile, many of the strongest collectors have spent the past few years buying, holding and accumulating. Supply isn’t what people think it is. Every time macro improves, ETH is increasingly outperforming BTC If that continues, FOMO returns, and repricing across NFTs could be far more violent than most expect

Non Playable Characters are becoming Playable Characters. Are you ready? @npconchain