The Twitter feed is messy; the best solution is to use a new small account. Out of politeness, many people use mute, but it’s ineffective—because the system still recommends content from related accounts. Even if you mute Account A, if A follows other accounts, those accounts will still appear in your feed. Just use a new small account—it’s that simple. On my small account, I only follow accounts that focus on specific opportunities and their underlying logic. I don’t follow any other irrelevant content.

That’s exactly right—and it’s incredibly difficult to achieve. The market doesn’t need so many KOLs shouting signals anyway—how many KOLs can truly resist trading themselves? Most barely scrape together some ad income or small profits, only to lose it all in the secondary market after hearing some “inside info” or simply giving in to the urge. To truly be part of this circle without trading yourself? That’s a top-tier skill.

It reminds me of the last 4Stock—investors and entrepreneurs have completely different perspectives. Investor: Such a strong narrative, perfect timing—stick to it, how could you not get 10x? Entrepreneur: I’ve made so much money I’ll never spend it all; why even keep going? This is already the ultimate ending of my life. To truly see someone’s ambition, look at what they’re still fighting for after achieving financial freedom. This is precisely when the project is at its highest risk—from the investor’s perspective.

I'm a long-time Rune player, and I’ll say this without emotion: Thor is merely a native cross-chain token swap channel—it cannot change the outcome. It cannot freeze anyone’s funds; even if nodes shut down the channel, the hacker simply doesn’t swap, and the money remains in their hands. But other nodes will immediately oppose and override them, because they want to make money—this directly conflicts with the protocol’s profitability.

Did you originally think Thor could freeze the coins in the hacker’s possession? Who can freeze BTC or ETH on the chain? If someone could, BTC and ETH would be ruined. Thor can at most shut down the hacker’s token-to-token trading channels—but control of the coins remains entirely with the hacker. Even if Thor does this, it has no impact on the outcome of the theft; the funds still remain in the hacker’s hands.

Everyone missed the move, and they're frustrated.

Fewer and fewer people are brave enough to put their judgments on the table and let the market test them—this is truly a case of bad money driving out good, leaving only two types of voices: 1. Always right, because they never say anything 2. Always bold liars, because liars don’t care Most retail traders are emotional infants: they want someone to hand them the password, yet refuse to take responsibility for the consequences of their decisions. “I followed you, and I lost everything—I’ll destroy you.” Take responsibility for your own positions.

What happened? Lost more than half.

For this new chain opportunity, I recommend a barbell strategy: allocate 80% of your funds to Dragon One—over one cycle, Dragon One typically outperforms everything else. Use the remaining 20% for higher-risk plays, but always set a stop-loss for this portion. I’ve played this type of scenario many times before, often betting from start to finish, only to see my paper wealth swing wildly up and down—exhausting myself and ultimately losing money. That’s the fate of most people.

Huh??? Don't everyone work? I actually enjoy working.