avatar
Dc Dav

Following0Followers (X)2.56KPosts173Likes1.64K
avatar

.. @Polymarket is paying people to trade Anthropic before it even lists. They just launched their first Perps competition. $50K to the top 50 traders, running through Nov 16. Anthropic’s pre-IPO contract ($ANT ) gets 3× scoring. First place takes $10K. You need $100K in notional volume to even rank. The contract is currently trading around $1,829. That’s roughly a $1.83T implied valuation nearly double their $965B private round from May. They’re boosting the scoring on a company that just disclosed $895B in compute commitments and is targeting a mid-November IPO. Feels like they’re turning the actual IPO into a side event. [https://t.co/sFbIWIXKEZ] Are people actually trading the valuation, or just farming the leaderboard?

avatar

anthropic open interest jumped another $20m this weekend while entropy crossed $100m total oi. the pre-ipo book is still growing even as the price grinds lower. trading breakdown: - ant -usdc [@entropyIO] : mark around $1,763, implied valuation $1.76t - 24h volume: ~$15-16m - open interest on the anthropic market alone: roughly $80m+ and climbing - 24h change: down about 2% - leverage available up to 15x - funding still positive and small the big number: $20m more open interest added to anthropic in a single weekend, pushing entropy past $100m total oi in under three months. the twist is exactly what @Kintsugi_IO pointed out. every previous attempt to give regular people real exposure to pre-ipo names through shares, tokens, or securitized products has mostly failed. perps just give pure price exposure, no claim on the company, No allocation. No ownership. people keep adding size anyway, even after the s-1 filing and the move down from the $2t+ highs. either this is the cleanest price discovery private markets have ever had, or a lot of leveraged money is going to find out the hard way that derivative exposure cuts both ways once the actual ipo prints. which side are you on?

avatar

. $BNB is quietly running a $58m open interest book on entropy right now. price sitting at $711.68 while the oracle is $711.77. trading breakdown: bnb-usdc: mark $711.68, oracle $711.77 - 24h volume: $23.35m - open interest: $58.20m - 24h change: +$6.80 (+0.96%) - funding: 0.0013% with 41m left on the countdown - leverage available up to 10x the big number: $58.20m in open interest on a single crypto perp that most people still treat as a side market. the twist is the book is live on @entropyIO hip-3 stack next to pre-ipo names like anthropic. same matching engine, same margin system, just a pure crypto asset sitting in the middle of the private-company flow. volume is real ($23m in 24h) and the funding is still tiny. either this is just noise while attention stays on the pre-ipo names, or the on-chain crypto books are starting to matter more than people realize. the chart already shows a sharp drop and partial recovery around 700. which side are you watching?

avatar

I’ve been thinking about how weird it is that AI can answer almost anything instantly. but the second you want to actually use it without babysitting it, everything slows down because of money. Right now, if an app or an agent needs to call a model, someone still has to sign up, add a card, buy credits, and manage an API key. That works fine when a human is in the loop. It falls apart when the agent is supposed to just go do the thing especially when you don’t even know the final cost until the response is finished. That’s what Jamie from Alethieum is trying to fix with MPP-I. The simple idea is that the model should keep generating its answer without stopping, while the payment happens quietly on the side. The thinking doesn’t pause. You just pay for what was actually used, like how a taxi meter runs while you’re in the car and you settle at the end. He built it on @arc with USDC because agents need the payments to be as fast and boringly reliable as the models themselves. No waiting around, no complicated setup. Ando is the wallet side of it something an app, an agent, or even a robot simulation can use to hold money and pay for intelligence on its own. Watching him demo it with @bleso_a from Circle, from creating a wallet to an agent and a robot simulation actually sending USDC, made it feel less like a future idea and more like something people can start building with now. It just makes me wonder what starts to get built once agents don’t need a human with a credit card standing by every time they need to think. [ Architects are now 8161 members Arc team really working to filtering some corrupt accounts which is try to cheat the system] Contribute on Arc genuinely & consistently is the goal.

avatar

The Tesla Roadster 0-60 market is at 97% Yes while the resolution is still under dispute. Tesla held its Roadster event on October 15. The @Polymarket contract pays Yes only if a version of the car physically present at the event completes a live, timed 0-60 mph run under 1.0 seconds under its own power, and the time is demonstrated (timer, instrumentation, or official Tesla-published time for that specific run). A bare claim does not qualify. Current board: - Yes: 97¢ - Volume: $271K - One open No position shown: bought at 6.5¢, now 3.5¢ - Resolution status: Yes proposed, disputed, Yes proposed again, disputed, final review pending (roughly 3.5 days remaining) Tesla has publicly pointed to a sub-1-second time (including a 0.81-second figure in coverage). The contract language requires the timing to be demonstrated for the live run, not just announced. That distinction is what the disputes are testing. $271K has already traded at these levels. Whether the final review treats the demonstration as sufficient, or the disputes force a different outcome, determines who gets paid. I trade polymarket > NO at 5.7¢

avatar

In 2026 Apple transitioned to a new era under CEO John Ternus (with Tim Cook moving to Executive Chairman), launching its first foldable phone the iPhone Duo alongside the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max Main context > I'm written about rn @entropyIO has $40.68M open interest on AAPL-USDC perps. Mark price is holding near $346. 24h volume is $21.67M. Funding sits at –0.0007%. Up to 28x leverage is available. This is not light flow. Tens of millions in capital are already positioned around current levels on Entropy, with live depth visible on both sides of the book. Price has recovered from earlier weakness and is consolidating just under recent highs. Quick context for new traders: A perpetual futures contract (perp) lets you go long or short Apple’s price without owning the stock. There is no expiry. Positions are cash-settled in USDC. You post collateral and can use leverage (up to 28x on this market). Funding is a small periodic payment between longs and shorts that keeps the perp price close to the underlying. Negative funding means shorts are paying longs right now. On Entropy you get 24/7 trading (including when the Nasdaq is closed), transparent order books, self-custody of your funds, and direct access to the AAPL-USDC market alongside other equity and pre-IPO perps. You are not buying Apple shares you are trading a derivative that tracks the price. Any sharp move in Apple forces reactions from leveraged positions. The open question is whether this $40.68M in open interest is still early or already getting crowded

avatar

$IONQ is hanging around $39.89 right now with 10x open on Entropy. It is been sitting near $39.89 after sliding off that 52-week high up by $85 (range has been roughly $26–$85) Still a good bit above where it was in 2024 and early 2025. Catalysts look pretty straightforward for a pure-play quantum name. They raised 2026 revenue guidance to $450 -460M after bringing in SkyWater, moved into Stage C of DARPA’s Quantum Benchmarking Initiative (up to $300M potential), hit 99.99% two-qubit fidelity, have the Nvidia Superion setup in the works, and keep adding full-stack pieces through acquisitions. On @entropyIO for @entropymarkets it was available as a US equity perp at 10x (isolated margin, USDC) right alongside the other stocks and pre-IPO names. HIP-3 on Hyperliquid, so it’s 24/7 and your funds stay in your own wallet Just a high-beta quantum setup parked near $40 with the leverage already live on Entropy.

avatar

Polymarket has Marie Bouzkova at 69% over Clara Tauson (32%), with just $2.97K traded. @Polymarket No single trader or profit screenshot is shown this is simply a thin pre-match WTA market. How it works • Shares cost $0–$1 and pay $1 if that player wins • Bouzkova at 69¢ = 69% implied; Tauson at 32¢ = 32% • Buy the side you think is cheap, hold or sell. Low volume keeps prices stable but limits size. The math • Tauson at 32¢ → risk 32¢ to win 68¢ (~212% if she wins) • Bouzkova at 69¢ → risk 69¢ to win 31¢ (~45% if she wins) • Books and models price it almost the same (Bouzkova ~70–74%).

avatar

I’ve been just staring at these BTC 5-minute markets lately and realizing something. You can actually get paid for doing almost nothing. XO just turned on liquidity rewards for the Up/Down ones. There is a $1M USDC + 10M Conviction Points pool, and they’re paying people based on how you price your orders, the size, how long they sit there, and which side you’re on. So if you put up a limit order and just leave it, you’re already earning. And if it actually gets filled, you still get the 35% maker rebate on top. Epochs reset every day at midnight UTC, so it’s not like you have to babysit it forever. The video shows it pretty clearly that little “Liquidity rewards” tag on the market and the order book just sitting there ready. Feels different when you know the empty side of the book can actually pay you for existing. @xomarket