The criticism of the Altman ram comment is so weird to me. He’s objectively right. It’s more efficient to have it be used 100% of the time in a data center vs local inference.
Whether you agree with that approach from a centralization pov is a completely separate issue
market very clearly uneasy with uncertainty caused by ai - as can be seen by volatility in individual names and qqq - and rewarding safety and recurring revenue.
eg will companies be able to generate rev to justify capex? will industries be destroyed by ai? etc
it's been 5 months of the market terrified about any/all outcomes
and it's also why apple has done so well bc it's a capex-light recurring rev play. very short-sighted imo
-22% in 34 days on the back of 6% dilution is amazing
BUT MARKETS ARE FORWARD-LOOKING
yes, but have you considered looking forward to capex being increasingly funded by cash flows based on the gm that ant put up in their s-1?