

solana:6FhVPctYg363pQbs4iSvqyHe2cJzfsvFD96gePy6pump Dev background Abhilash Inumella previously co-founded Samosa Labs (short-video app, ~10M users, zero marketing spend, acquired by MPL after raising from Sequoia India and Xiaomi), Questbook (YC W21, decentralized grants platform that raised ~$8–9M and distributed $8–10M), and Reclaim Protocol (YC-backed zkTLS for verifiable data proofs, 3M+ verifications). Exfil is his newest project. Economics vs FOMO Exfil charges 0.375% per side (0.75% round-trip) and splits every fee three ways: one-third returned to traders as EXFIL tokens, one-third used to buy and burn EXFIL, and one-third for operations. It has a token that shares upside via rebates and burns. FOMO charges ~0.50% per side (~1% round-trip on larger trades, higher effective rates on small Solana orders) and keeps essentially all fees (minus referral commissions). It has no token, so there is no shared ownership or buyback/burn mechanism for users.

Revolut is down today because of a Google Cloud outage in London (europe-west2). A power event in one availability zone knocked out multiple services. Revolut’s app, cards, and payments went offline (funds and data are safe). Other banks and services were hit too. Why didn’t multi-region or multi-cloud save them? They use Google Cloud heavily (multi-year partnership) and do multi-region for some workloads. But the critical path (auth, card authorization, payments) was still too dependent on the London region. When that region had issues, failover didn’t fully cover it. True active-active multi-region/multi-cloud for stateful banking systems is expensive and complex (data consistency, latency, compliance, testing). Many fintechs accept the residual risk until an incident forces the issue. Decentralized options like Akash $AKT can reduce single-provider risk in theory, but they don’t currently match the compliance, SLAs, and predictability banks need for production payments infrastructure.





