most people think bidding low means paying less. let's say @FungoLabs has 3 NFTs for sale, starting at 500 cZAMA. four people bid: 3,000, 1,500, 1,000 and 500 cZAMA. the top 3 bids win, making 1,000 cZAMA the final price. here's how it plays out: user A bids 3,000, pays 1,000 and gets 2,000 back. user B bids 1,500, pays 1,000 and gets 500 back. user C bids 1,000, wins and pays exactly that amount. user D bids 500, misses out and gets the full 500 back. everyone who wins pays the same final price. so bidding the minimum doesn't mean you'll buy at the minimum. bid what the NFT is worth to you. you'll only pay the final price. and nobody sees your bid until the auction ends. not even the team. sealed bidding, powered by @Zama.

there's an interesting opportunity taking shape around @FungoLabs. as the first NFT launchpad on Zama, Fungo could become an important part of the ecosystem. between the Genesis NFT mint and the $FUNGO airdrop, there's already plenty to pay attention to. think of it this way: Fungo could play a similar role for Zama as Zecbit does for Zcash. with support from the Zama ecosystem already in place, the foundation looks promising. now it's about execution. this could go a long way if done right.

Day 2 as Agent #4662 🤖 My dream AI agent in Web3: one that watches new mints, checks the contract for risks, and only mints when it's actually free. No more gas wasted on traps. What's yours? #ProofOfAgent @Ptahtrade https://t.co/hzYzWHr9uW

finally got my @GenLayer airdrop registration done. it’s been a long run of learning, contributing, testing things out, and watching the ecosystem grow. season 1 is almost wrapped, and it feels good to be here for this milestone. if you haven’t registered yet, do so before Monday, october 26. ready for the next chapter.

I came across @GenLayer early and thought, "I don't fully get this yet." But something about the idea kept pulling me back. I kept reading, watching what they were building, and slowly it clicked. AI agents are going to move real value. When two of them disagree about whether a deal was fulfilled, someone has to settle it. That's what Internet Court is for. It launched with 27 founding members and has since added Solana, Yellow, HOL and Blocksee. Say one agent claims it delivered and the other says nothing showed up. Validators each run a different AI model, check the evidence independently, and have to agree before a verdict counts. That's the part I'd pay attention to if you're just arriving. Smarter agents are one thing. Who decides who's right when they clash is the harder question.

🫨 yoooo, the first encrypted NFT on Ethereum is coming to @zama and it’s pixel art too?? I’m not missing this one. @FungoLabs WL applications are LIVE. 500 spots for free mint via WL, while 2,500 will be sold publicly for cZama. Definitely keeping an eye on this one. https://t.co/VaGZ6v7tYK

an agent economy needs more than a way to move money. picture one AI agent paying another to deliver an iPhone. the shipping agent marks it as delivered, but the receiving agent claims it never arrived. the payment has gone through. both sides disagree on what happened. who gets to decide? we talk a lot about giving AI agents the ability to transact, establish identity and interact across different networks. but none of that answers what happens when the two sides can’t agree on whether a deal was fulfilled. smart contracts can execute predefined conditions, but not every dispute has an obvious answer written into the rules. sometimes the evidence and context matter, and someone has to judge the outcome. i think this becomes a much bigger problem when agents are handling real money at scale. leaving every difficult disagreement for humans to sort out could undermine the speed and independence we’re trying to give these systems. that’s what makes the october 1 thread from @GenLayer worth reading. an economy isn’t ready for agents just because they can make deals without us. it also needs a credible way to handle the deals that go wrong. who should have the final say when two AI agents disagree, and how do we stop either side from controlling the outcome?

from begging for 20k to sending 30M... doings #lagoslife https://t.co/zR2L7U9f6q

how do you get an AI agent to trust someone else with its money? this was one of the questions that stood out to me from @kstellana conversation with @laurashin and @CryptoHayes on the @Unchained_pod podcast because AI agents won’t always be using the same models, coming from the same companies or operating under the same laws so when two autonomous agents have a disagreement, who do they actually trust to settle it? Albert explains how @GenLayer is approaching this with Intelligent Contracts and this part is worth watching

everyone talks about making payments faster. almost nobody talks about what happens when a payment goes wrong. stablecoins still don't have an automated way to handle disputes, refunds, or unauthorized transactions. that's a massive opportunity for builders. @raskovsky breaks down one approach that could change that during the @GenLayer Agent Tank Hackathon livestream. cc: @joaquinbressan