Nothing kills a research session faster than a refresh wiping the whole chat halfway through building a strategy. That’s one of the quieter fixes in @minara’s Web V2. Chats now survive page switches and dropped connections. The headline is the sandbox. Every user gets their own cloud server to run things on, so strategies can keep working without your laptop staying open. Strategy work is tidier too. Drafts, versions and backtests sit in one place, and you can paste in code you’ve already written instead of rebuilding it. And there’s a new CryptoQuant plugin, so onchain data is right there in the same chat. If you use it to run strategies rather than just ask it questions, this is the version worth trying. Not financial advice.

$ONDO overtook BlackRock in tokenized Treasuries. The challenger became the leader. Don’t count yourself out.

$TAO is at $236. $RENDER is at $1.61. But Render just reported $23.3M in Q3 revenue, 92% of it in September alone. Which AI token actually has revenue backing the narrative? https://t.co/v1VR71cUoz

$ONDO is building more than a tokenized asset platform. It’s entering the derivatives market. Ondo Perps just crossed $20B in cumulative trading volume. The numbers are getting harder to ignore: → $20B+ cumulative trading volume → $1.9B added in the past week → $100M+ open interest → $38M in Ondo Stocks collateral → 88 markets across spot and perpetuals The bigger play is bringing equity derivatives, deeper liquidity, and capital efficiency onchain. No expiry. No closing bell. Global market access. $ONDO is pushing tokenized finance beyond ownership and into active trading.

$SUI Q3 2026 Recap $SUI gained 68.6% in Q3, from $0.69 on July 1 to $1.16 on September 30. It bottomed at $0.65 in August, then rallied to $1.26 in September. Tech & Throughput 🔹 AI Agent Throughput: $SUI hit 6.09 million transactions per second in an AI agent livestream experiment. Agents and users played games, chatted and made payments in off-chain tunnels that settle to Sui. 🔹 Hashi Testnet: Hashi launched its testnet for Bitcoin-native finance on $SUI, letting developers build lending and credit apps that use BTC as collateral. 🔹 Quantum-Ready Security: $SUI announced plans to add NIST-approved post-quantum signatures. Accounts can switch to quantum-safe keys while keeping their address and recovery phrase. 🔹 Testnet v1.80.1 (Protocol 137): Cheaper range-proof verification, bigger batch limits and optional gas-price-priority transaction selection for validators. Testnet only. Partnerships & Institutions 🔹 Gorae x $SUI: Gorae is bringing 50,000+ EV chargers in South Korea on-chain, using $SUI for payment settlement and Walrus for verifiable charging records. 🔹 tZERO x $SUI: tZERO brought its regulated digital securities infrastructure to $SUI, so projects can issue and trade tokenized securities without building their own compliance and custody. 🔹 Securitize & Neuberger: Securitize and Neuberger launched a tokenized high-income fund on $SUI, Avalanche, Ethereum and Solana. 🔹 Daya Payments: Nigerian fintech Daya now uses $SUI to settle gasless stablecoin payments for African businesses. 🔹 DeepBook App: DeepBook launched its trading app in alpha, with spot trading on $SUI’s on-chain order book and one-minute Bitcoin prediction markets. ETF & Events 🔹 21Shares ETF: The 21Shares $SUI ETF became the 21Shares Sui Staking ETF and switched its benchmark to the FTSE Sui Index in August. 🔹 Sui Overflow Hackathon: $SUI named 16 winners across four tracks plus 10 university award teams. Which $SUI update matters most going into Q4?

Grayscale filed another amendment for a proposed $TAO ETF. Which AI ticker benefits most if institutional products expand beyond $BTC and $ETH?

Two major RWA infrastructure plays. One connects global financial markets to blockchains. The other targets enterprise-grade tokenization and real-world applications. $LINK vs $HBAR Head to Head Series RWA Edition $LINK: The institutional interoperability play. → Price: $10.99 → Market cap: $8.43B → 24h volume: $819M → FDV: $10.99B → Circulating supply: 766.8M / 1B LINK → Transaction value enabled: $36.4T+ → LINK in Chainlink Reserve: 6M+ Chainlink provides the oracle data and cross-chain infrastructure that tokenized assets need to work across financial markets. Its latest major catalyst is CCIP 2.0, launched at Sibos on September 28 to help institutions move tokenized assets across blockchains. ANZ and Fidelity International took part, with backing from Deutsche Börse’s Crypto Finance and SBI Digital Markets. The bull case: Chainlink can benefit from tokenization across many networks without needing to become the dominant blockchain itself. Flip side: LINK carries a much higher valuation, and more tokenization doesn’t automatically mean more demand for the token. $HBAR: The enterprise tokenization play. → Price: $0.0708 → Market cap: $3.14B → 24h volume: $158M → Circulating supply: 44.33B / 50B HBAR → Total network transactions: 71B+ → Accounts created: 10M+ → Consensus finality: 2.9 seconds Hedera is a public network built for low-cost transactions, enterprise apps and token issuance through the Hedera Token Service. A notable RWA development is Asseto, a tokenization platform that went live on Hedera and HashSphere in June. It handles issuance, trading and settlement for tokenized equities, bonds, funds and loans. Still, Hedera’s tokenized RWA footprint is small. https://t.co/zm8dzD2yWb shows about $92M in tokenized assets distributed on Hedera. Flip side: HBAR is smaller than LINK, but the network still needs to turn enterprise interest into much more tokenized value and recurring usage. My take: $LINK is the more established bet on the infrastructure connecting tokenized assets across markets and blockchains. $HBAR is the smaller bet on enterprises choosing Hedera to issue and settle assets. The key difference: Chainlink connects tokenized finance across networks, while Hedera is a network where tokenized assets get issued and traded. Which RWA thesis do you prefer: $LINK’s interoperability edge or $HBAR’s enterprise adoption potential?

$BTC is trading below the rising channel’s midpoint on the daily chart after forming lower highs from September’s peak around $87K. I see momentum weakening here, even though price remains inside the broader rising channel. The dashed support line sits around $79.5K at the current candle, and I’m watching whether today closes below it. I’ll stay cautious unless BTC reclaims $79K–$80K and starts holding above that midpoint.

Top RWA Tokens by Holder Count (all chains combined): $XDC: 2,000,000+* $LINK: 1,724,479 $PLUME: 990,677* $ONDO: 218,414 $QNT: 186,102 $INJ: 115,239 $RIO: 50,475 $SYRUP: 25,055 $CPOOL: 23,463 $SKY: 16,862 $GFI: 15,869 $STBL: 15,781 $CFG: 11,554 $DMTR: 10,302 $POLYX: 6,442 $LINK has 1.7M holders across 20 chains. That’s more than the 13 tokens below it combined. Since January, $SKY and $CFG grew their holder base by about 45% each. This is what it looks like when the “boring” part of crypto keeps onboarding people quietly, long before the hype shows up. (*Includes native-chain accounts, which count every wallet on the explorer, not just holders.)

Top 9 AI Coins by Q3 2026 Revenue. Who’s actually generating real money? $RENDER: $23.3M $LINK: $14.6M $ATH: $9.3M $NEAR: $4.5M $TAO: $3.0M $VVV: $2.0M $VIRTUAL: $636K $ICP: $325K $AKT: $33K $VVV tripled its revenue from Q2, and $NEAR nearly tripled. $VIRTUAL and $ICP each lost over a third. $TAO fell 17%. $RENDER tops the list, but $21.4M of it landed in September alone, so watch whether that holds in Q4. Over time, price tends to follow revenue. Are you holding the right ones? 𝘋𝘢𝘵𝘢: 𝘈𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘴 (𝘘3 𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘶𝘦, 𝘑𝘶𝘭 1 𝘵𝘰 𝘚𝘦𝘱 30), 𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴-𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘋𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘓𝘭𝘢𝘮𝘢