Google dropped 12.64% today, closing at $283.82—its largest single-day decline since going public. A netizen shared the chart below, which shows that based on historical data, 10 out of 13 such sharp declines were followed by profitable outcomes. So if you bought Google on Monday and held it for 60 trading days, your probability of profit would be approximately 84% https://t.co/i2Vl9RfyAY
Two hours ago, a netizen noticed that Claude Fable 5.5 briefly appeared in the Azure model catalog, but Anthropic’s official website has not yet announced it. If true, this update could be the most critical factor affecting the $ANT listing. 成败在此一举？？？ https://t.co/lLDHdOiTA9
My idea is to avoid following the path of purely crypto content creators, as it’s easy to become just a “content machine.” Broad traffic is crucial for your account—it determines your audience reach. For example, @_FORAB’s content style also qualifies as broad traffic, but when handled well, it can significantly enhance your personal value. You’ll also unlock more monetization channels, building a deeper moat for your future, because you won’t be reliant on the volatility or hype of a single industry. If you’re solely a crypto content creator, a market downturn could exponentially increase your earning challenges—no matter how well you perform, uncertainty will remain high. In today’s自媒体 era, holistic development is essential: current events, AI, U.S. stocks, crypto, politics, entertainment, technology. Don’t limit yourself to just one field.
This is the ideal ETF list for beginners, tailored for absolute newcomers interested in U.S. stocks. I’ve compiled a complete list of the top 30 U.S. stock ETFs from ETF Database and visualized the most critical data. The top three—VOO, IVV, and SPY—all track the S&P 500 and have very similar investment objectives. However, larger assets under management don’t necessarily mean higher returns; differences in ETFs, especially costs, can be significant. For example, VOO and IVV both have an expense ratio of 0.03%, while SPY charges 0.09%. Similarly, for Nasdaq-100 ETFs, QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, whereas QQQM is 0.15%. Over the past five years, their returns were 16.2% and 16.3% respectively—nearly identical. The top performers over the past year and five years have been technology-focused ETFs: XLK rose 36.8% over the past year with a 21.9% annualized return, while VGT gained 33.0% over the past year with a 20.7% annualized return. Bond ETFs have underperformed in recent years: BND and AGG both declined 1.6% over the past year and posted a -0.5% annualized return over five years. The gold ETF GLD rose just 1.7% over the past year but delivered an impressive 18.2% annualized return over the past five years.
