$UBER just reported its Q3 2026 results on Nov 4. Two key takeaways: 1. Non-GAAP EPS came in at $0.88 (+35% YoY), while revenue reached $14.77B (+10% YoY). Gross Bookings also grew 20% YoY to $59.8B. 2. Delivery Gross Bookings increased 22% YoY, while Mobility faced pressure from higher fuel costs and tighter driver availability across several international markets. Looking ahead, Q4 Non-GAAP EPS guidance came in at $0.95–$0.99, below the roughly $1.06 analyst consensus reported by Reuters. Despite the weaker outlook, $UBER shares moved higher following the earnings release. Now tracking the market reaction on UBER/USD. @DecibelTrade

$AMD just reported a record quarter after the bell on Nov 3. Two key facts: 1. Revenue reached $13.4B (+45% YoY), beating estimates, with non-GAAP EPS of $2.09 (+74% YoY). 2. Data Center revenue surged 97% YoY to a record $8.5B, driven by strong demand for EPYC CPUs and Instinct GPUs. Q4 revenue guidance came in at approximately $17B, above market expectations. Strong AI and data center momentum continues. Now tracking the market reaction on AMD/USD. @DecibelTrade

$AAPL delivered strong Q4 numbers, but the market reaction tells a different story. Revenue reached $114.5B (+12% YoY), iPhone revenue hit a September-quarter record of $57.58B, and diluted EPS came in at $2.10. Services also reached an all-time high. Despite the strong results, $AAPL/USD is currently moving lower on @DecibelTrade

DecibelTrade is demonstrating how far fully onchain trading on Aptos can go. What sets @DecibelTrade apart isn’t just the number of markets or trading volume, but how they’ve built their entire system from the ground up. Order placement, matching, settlement, and risk management all occur onchain—without relying on off-chain matching engines like hybrid models. Some notable highlights: • Fully onchain: All trading activity is transparent and verifiable. • Speed: Leverages Aptos’ infrastructure to deliver fast trading experiences. • Over 80 markets, including crypto perps, spot, equities, and commodities. • Cross-margin support with multiple collateral assets. • Encrypted mempool reduces MEV exploitation risks. • APT burn mechanism tied to trading activity. Another interesting feature: Decibel has integrated with @useTria, enabling users to access spot and perpetual trading directly within their self-custody app. What matters most isn’t simply how many markets a perp DEX offers, but whether it can deliver a CEX-like experience while preserving DeFi’s transparency and asset control. This is the direction I’m keen to continue following with Decibel. #Decibel #Aptos #OnchainTrading

1/ Decibel vs other Perp DEXs: Where does it actually stand? Decibel is a fully onchain Spot + Perp DEX built on Aptos. Orders are placed, matched and settled onchain, without an offchain matching engine. Since launching its mainnet in February 2026, cumulative volume has reportedly surpassed $8.5B. But how does it compare with Hyperliquid and Lighter? Let's look at the bigger picture. 👇 2/ The scale gap is still massive October 2026 figures: • Decibel: ~$1.26B 30D volume | ~$3M OI • Hyperliquid: ~$150–200B 30D volume | ~$8–11B OI • Lighter: ~$50–65B 30D volume | $500M+ OI Decibel has made progress, but it's still operating at a very different scale. Volume gets attention. Sustainable liquidity is what keeps serious traders around. 3/ Where Decibel stands out ✅ Fully onchain infrastructure on Aptos ✅ Crosschain USDC deposits designed to reduce bridging friction ✅ Stock, ETF and commodity perps, with supported markets available beyond traditional trading hours ✅ Fast execution and sub second finality ✅ Competitive fee structure, including maker incentives for eligible tiers Decibel doesn't need to become the next Hyperliquid. It needs to give traders a compelling reason to stay. 4/ The real challenges Thin liquidity and low OI can mean wider spreads and more slippage on larger orders. Volume alone doesn't tell the whole story. OI, unique traders and retention matter too. Execution needs to remain reliable during periods of high volatility. Hyperliquid and Lighter already benefit from stronger liquidity and established network effects. 5/ What should Decibel prioritize? Attract more market makers to deepen order books and tighten spreads. Grow sustainable OI instead of chasing short term volume. Make trader incentives clearer and more compelling. Improve maker rebates and fee tiers to attract liquidity providers. Build long term value. If a token ever comes, its utility needs to be meaningful. 6/ Bottom line Decibel has solid technology and a differentiated direction, especially in its approach to equities and commodities. But in the perp DEX race, technology alone isn't enough. Liquidity, execution quality and trader retention are what matter in the long run. I'd rather see deeper order books and sustainable OI than another volume milestone without lasting users. The opportunity is there. Now it's about execution. What do you think Decibel needs most right now: deeper liquidity, better incentives, or something else? @DecibelTrade #Decibel #Hyperliquid #PerpDEX #Aptos

I once went long BTC x25 and, overconfident, didn’t set a stop-loss. A minor dump wiped out my entire margin. 📉 I was really discouraged at the time, but then I remembered @DecibelTrade’s Liquidation Rebate program. I redeposited a small amount, placed one small trade to meet the eligibility requirements, waited for the cycle to end, and then went to /rewards claim. Thanks to the program, I recovered a portion of my lost margin (up to $500 per cycle, according to program details). I received $3.72 in May and an additional $10.21 in June. The amounts aren’t large, but they gave me just enough motivation to keep going. To this day, I still maintain my streak and farm AMPs. After that experience, I learned my lesson: always set stop-losses and manage position sizes more carefully. The rebate doesn’t erase your losses, but at least it gives you another chance to recover. Proof of my rebate claim below 👇 @DecibelTrade (Personal experience shared—not investment advice.)

@vmhoangit1408 The new integration is really impressive, promising an explosive 2026 for TRON!

ETH USD Perps | SHORT 40x @StandX_Official Price stayed below VWAP and failed multiple attempts to reclaim the mid Bollinger Band. Every push into the upper band was rejected immediately, confirming sellers defending the range high. Structure was clear. Lower highs, compressed volatility, and delta failing to expand on upside moves. The short was taken on rejection near the Bollinger mid with invalidation defined above the band and prior high. Isolated margin only. Risk fixed before entry. No scaling, no hedging. Execution based purely on structure and volatility behavior. Once price accepted back into the lower half of the range, continuation followed naturally. Result +11.16 percent PnL. No narratives. Just structure, volatility, and clean execution. #StandX

Here’s the read on ETH USD 15 minute chart on StandX, written in the same tone mod usually likes. ETH is still trading in a short term corrective phase after failing to hold the prior upside structure. The earlier push higher lost momentum near the upper Bollinger Band and price has since rotated back into the middle of the range rather than extending. Price recently broke below the mid Bollinger Band and spent time trading closer to the lower band. That matters. This was not a single wick rejection. Candles are closing lower and follow through selling appeared, which suggests acceptance rather than a quick liquidity sweep. Both MA 7 and MA 15 are flattening and starting to roll over. Price remains below MA 15 and is only reclaiming MA 7 briefly on small bounces. This usually points to a market that is still correcting rather than transitioning back into a clean trend. Bollinger Bands remain relatively wide, especially on the downside. Volatility has not fully compressed yet. When bands stay open like this, price often continues to probe liquidity zones before stabilizing. Volume expanded during the downside move and did not fully dry up on the bounce. That reduces the probability that the recent move up is a strong V shaped reversal. For now it looks more like a reaction than a confirmed shift in control. Key areas to watch The 2345 to 2355 zone remains an important decision area. This aligns with the mid Bollinger Band and MA 15. Any push into this zone without strong follow through should be treated as a reaction, not a trend change. On the downside, the 2325 to 2330 area is the short term support zone. If price revisits this area and holds with reduced selling pressure, a base can form. If it breaks with momentum, continuation lower becomes the dominant scenario. As long as price stays below the mid Bollinger Band and MA 15, the short term bias remains cautious. Patience matters here. Let price show acceptance or rejection at key zones before committing

ETH on StandX (15m) is still clearly in a range, not a trend. After the sharp drop earlier, price bounced but failed to print a higher high. Since then, it’s been chopping sideways with MA7 and MA15 tangled together and Bollinger Bands staying relatively tight. Momentum is weak and the market is waiting for direction. The 2943 – 2945 area is acting as short term resistance. Each push into this zone slows down quickly, candles get smaller, and buyers don’t follow through. If price can’t break and hold above this level, it’s more likely just a technical bounce. On the downside, 2933 – 2935 is holding as support. Every dip into this zone gets bought back fairly quickly, showing sellers aren’t in full control yet. On @StandX_Official , this kind of structure is easy to read because price action and execution stay clean. In conditions like this: Breakout trades have no edge The middle of the range is pure noise Best trades come from clear reactions at the range boundaries Sideways market → trade it like a sideways market. No need to predict whether ETH is about to moon or dump.