TRON leads 24-hour stablecoin transfer volume growth with $19.4 billion! Once again, data from Token Terminal highlights TRON’s prominent role in stablecoin movement across the market. According to statistics shared by the RWA Foundation, over the past 24 hours, USDT on the TRON network recorded a transfer volume increase of $19.4 billion, ranking first among all tracked stablecoin assets and blockchains. 🔴 Top rankings: 🥇 USDT on TRON: +$19.4B 🥈 USDC on Ethereum: +$11.4B 🥉 USDC on Base: +$5.8B Followed by USDT on Ethereum (+$5.5B), USDC on Solana (+$5.5B), and DAI on Ethereum (+$3B). 💡 What’s noteworthy isn’t just the $19.4 billion in a single day, but TRON’s dominant position in stablecoin transfers compared to other major blockchain ecosystems. Stablecoins require infrastructure capable of moving value at massive scale—and TRON continues to prove its leadership in this race. Data source: @tokenterminal, per RWA Foundation. Figures reflect 24-hour transfer volume increases, not stablecoin supply growth. Stay updated on TRON news via @trondao @justinsuntron

If you don’t bet on this hot pick, what else are you playing? I feel like the NFT season is back. Where there’s an NFT, there’s money. And with a free mint? Even better. Join below in the quote.

🌐 TRON is opening the door to traditional financial markets! According to CoinDesk’s Q3/2026 research report, TRON is taking significant steps to expand access for institutions and investors in the United States. 📊 Key highlights: 🔴 The TRXS ETF has launched on the Cboe BZX Exchange, becoming the first TRON product listed in the U.S. according to the report, with an initial $50 million in assets under management. 🔴 Bitnomial is expanding access to TRX through a U.S.-regulated futures market. 🔴 CoinDesk’s charts show a strong increase in assets under management for TRON ETFs/ETPs in Q3/2026, with TRXS contributing significantly to this growth. 💡 Notably, TRON is not only building scale within its stablecoin and on-chain payment ecosystem, but also expanding channels for investors to access TRX through regulated financial infrastructure. The combination of on-chain liquidity, investment products, and institutional access could help TRON deepen its integration with traditional financial markets. This is a noteworthy development in TRON’s journey to bring its ecosystem closer to U.S. financial institutions and investors. Stay updated on TRON news via @trondao and boss @justinsuntron, guys!

TRON DAO marks the milestone of 16 billion cumulative transactions! 16 billion transactions is an enormous figure, reflecting the scale of activity the TRON network has supported throughout its development. 🌐 Stablecoins 💸 Payments ⚡ Smart contracts Behind this milestone are billions of interactions and value transfers on the blockchain. TRON is not only growing in scale but also continuing to solidify its critical role in on-chain stablecoin and payment infrastructure. 16B transactions. Real usage. Massive scale. 🔴 Keep building @trondao @justinsuntron

🌐 TRON Connects Global Stablecoin Liquidity with U.S. Institutional Financial Infrastructure For years, TRON has emerged as one of the most significant networks in the stablecoin market. In Q3 2026 alone, the network processed $2.21 trillion in stablecoin payments, with the combined supply of USDT and USDD on TRON reaching $93.88 billion by quarter-end. However, this massive liquidity is only part of the story. For traditional financial institutions to engage more deeply in the on-chain ecosystem, they also require custody, asset management, and staking infrastructure that meets their regulatory requirements. 🤝 Anchorage Digital Opens New Access Channels for Institutions Through its partnership with Anchorage Digital Bank, N.A., TRON expands access to the U.S. institutional market. Anchorage Digital Bank is the first federally licensed digital asset bank in the U.S., regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). This integration enables custody of TRX and standard TRC-20 digital assets within institutional-grade infrastructure, allowing investment funds and financial institutions to manage assets such as TRX and USDT on the TRON network through specialized custody services. ⚡ Not Just Custody—Also Incentivizing On-Chain Participation Another key development is Anchorage Digital’s deployment of TRX staking via its platform and Porto, a self-custody wallet solution. This provides institutions with an additional option to actively participate in staking and earn network rewards, rather than passively holding assets. Actual rewards remain subject to network conditions and applicable fees. By combining custody, staking, and institutional market access, TRON gains critical components to attract institutional financial activity. 📊 Three Converging Advantages 🔴 Existing Liquidity: $2.21 trillion in stablecoin payments processed in Q3 2026. 🔴 Major USDT Platform: $93.88 billion combined supply of USDT and USDD on TRON by quarter-end. 🔴 Institutional Access Infrastructure: Custody for TRC-20 assets, TRX staking, and the launch of the TRXS ETF in the U.S. in 2026. 💡 My Perspective Notably, TRON does not wait for liquidity to form after institutional adoption—it already possesses substantial stablecoin scale. Integrations like Anchorage Digital expand pathways for institutional capital to enter the ecosystem. If this trend continues, TRON has strong potential to solidify its role in cross-border payments, treasury management, and digital USD circulation on blockchain. Of course, infrastructure integration does not guarantee an immediate surge in institutional capital. Adoption speed depends on market demand, regulatory policies, and individual institutional decisions. From large-scale stablecoin liquidity to institutional-grade custody and staking, TRON is steadily narrowing the gap between on-chain finance and traditional financial markets. Stay updated on TRON news via @trondao @justinsuntron.

TRON deploys the mandatory GreatVoyage-v4.8.2.4 (Empedocles) upgrade. On October 23, TRON DAO announced the GreatVoyage-v4.8.2.4 (Empedocles) release, a mandatory upgrade for node operators on the TRON network. 🔧 This upgrade focuses on two technical improvements: 🔹 Enhanced execution consistency: Improves stability in rare edge cases, enabling the protocol to handle exceptional scenarios more effectively. 🔹 Optimized data processing: Adjusts how smart contract storage data and metadata are handled in specific conditions. 🌐 This is not an update introducing immediately noticeable new features. Instead, the focus lies at the protocol layer, where data processing consistency and reliability are critical to the network’s overall operation. For a high-volume blockchain like TRON, continuously refining how edge cases are handled is essential to maintaining a stable infrastructure. A strong network doesn’t just need to scale quickly—it must also become more accurate and consistent over time. Stay updated with TRON news via @trondao @justinsuntron.

zBit Edu Hub | On-Chain Analysis: DEX Liquidity – A Critical Factor in DeFi Trading A token with a strong price surge or attractive APY isn’t necessarily a good opportunity. Before investing, look beyond price charts and pay attention to a crucial factor: liquidity on DEX. What is DEX Liquidity? On decentralized exchanges (DEX), trades are typically executed through liquidity pools containing two assets, such as ETH and USDC. The deeper the liquidity, the lower the price impact of a trade. Why is liquidity important? ✅ Reduced Slippage: Low liquidity can cause you to buy at a higher price or sell at a lower price than expected. ✅ Assessing Exit Feasibility: A token may rally sharply, but if liquidity is insufficient, selling a large amount becomes difficult. ✅ Identifying Risks: Low liquidity, concentrated liquidity from a few providers, or sudden liquidity withdrawals are all red flags. Key factors traders should check: 📊 TVL & Liquidity Depth: Evaluate the total value locked and the depth of liquidity around the current price. 📈 Volume/TVL Ratio: Monitor pool activity, but remember that high volume doesn’t equate to low risk. 🔐 Liquidity Providers & Lock Status: Check whether liquidity is concentrated in a few wallets and whether it’s locked. Locking liquidity reduces the risk of sudden withdrawals during the lock period, but doesn’t eliminate all risks. 🎯 Main Pool & Slippage: Focus on the primary trading pool and set a reasonable slippage tolerance before swapping. 📊 Let’s analyze an ETH/USDC pool: Assume a pool has: TVL: $20 million 24-hour trading volume: $8 million Swap fee: 0.3% We can estimate: ✅ Daily trading fees: $24,000 (assuming all volume incurs the 0.3% fee). ✅ Volume/TVL ratio: 0.4. ✅ Annualized fee yield on TVL: ~43.8%, assuming volume and TVL remain constant—excluding other costs and risks. For a $100,000 trade, a pool with $20 million TVL typically has lower price impact than a pool with only $2 million TVL. However, actual slippage also depends on pool structure, trade direction, and fee types. 🛠️ Useful Tools You can use DexScreener, DEXTools, and Birdeye to monitor liquidity, TVL, trading volume, and pool activity. 🔴 Conclusion High APY doesn’t guarantee a good opportunity. Understanding liquidity depth, trading activity, concentration of liquidity providers, and exit feasibility are essential when assessing DEX risks. Through zBit Edu Hub, you can gradually build your on-chain knowledge base and make more informed decisions when participating in DeFi. 🚀 @zBit_Official

Vietnam has a proud tradition of mathematical excellence. 🇻🇳 From IMO medalists to Fields Medalist Ngo Bao Chau, Vietnamese talent has already made its mark on global mathematics. Now, the Justin Sun Prize could create another opportunity for that talent to shine. The new MathDB pilot covers 50 mathematical problems, with problem-level rewards of up to $1M. Led by Caltech Professor Tony Yue Yu and his team, MathDB introduces a formal process for reviewing solutions, verifying Lean proofs, and recognizing clear explanations of mathematical discoveries. What makes this especially valuable for researchers is the reward structure: • 50% for the mathematical solution • 30% for Lean formalization • 20% for accessible mathematical exposition This means the program recognizes more than just finding an answer. It also values rigorous verification and making complex discoveries understandable to others. For Vietnamese mathematicians, former IMO competitors, and independent researchers, this could be a meaningful incentive to explore challenging open problems and collaborate with AI. Meanwhile, Vietnam is gradually building a clearer legal framework for crypto and digital assets. The government's pilot framework for the crypto-asset market, introduced under Resolution 05/2025/NQ-CP, marks an important step toward a more structured and regulated ecosystem. These developments create an interesting intersection between scientific research, AI, and blockchain-based rewards. Imagine more Vietnamese researchers contributing to long-standing mathematical problems, with their work independently verified and recognized on an international stage. Vietnam has already demonstrated its ability to nurture exceptional mathematical talent. Initiatives like the Justin Sun Prize could provide another incentive for that talent to pursue groundbreaking research and push the boundaries of human knowledge. The next breakthrough could come from Vietnam. @justinsuntron @JustinSunPrize

Is InfoFi about to make a comeback? 👀 Something interesting is happening around @termix_ai . The KOL Posts TP rewards campaign on https://t.co/d8bMh2Z7xP has been temporarily paused, but instead of stepping away from creator incentives, TermiX is directing KOLs toward its Agent Economy Katalyst Campaign with @KaitoAI. And the timing caught my attention. Over the past few days, I've noticed more prominent Kaito creators talking about the agent economy, while TermiX continues building visibility through the Kaito ecosystem. Here's why I think this is worth watching 👇 🔹 TermiX is shifting the campaign focus. The temporary pause of direct KOL Posts TP rewards puts more attention on the Kaito Katalyst campaign. 🔹 Mindshare is becoming important again. Projects aren't just competing to build products. They're also competing for attention, meaningful discussions, and community recognition. 🔹 AI Agents give InfoFi a new narrative. The conversation is moving beyond token speculation toward agent identity, onchain reputation, autonomous work, and real economic activity. 🔹 Creator participation could amplify the trend. When established Kaito creators consistently discuss a project, it can attract more contributors and bring a narrative back into the spotlight. But there's an important distinction: more posts don't automatically mean a sustainable InfoFi revival. The real test is whether attention translates into genuine engagement, product usage, and long-term community participation. Personally, I think TermiX × Kaito is an interesting combination to watch because it connects two things that matter in Web3: the infrastructure for an emerging agent economy and the creator ecosystem that helps people discover it. Could this be an early signal of InfoFi returning with a new AI Agent narrative? I'm watching how the next Katalyst campaign develops. 👀💚 What do you think is InfoFi getting a second wind, or is this just another short-lived attention cycle?

What makes Grvt’s buyback and burn more interesting to me is the potential connection between product revenue and token supply. A trading platform generates activity. If that activity translates into sustainable business revenue, and the project uses part of its resources to buy back and permanently burn tokens, you get a model worth watching. @grvt_io has already completed its first buyback and burn, removing 1.1M GRVT from circulation — nearly 1% of the circulating supply at the time of purchase. That’s a real action, not just a roadmap promise. Now look at the bigger picture. Grvt is reporting substantial perp trading volume, while Grvt 2.0 aims to expand beyond trading through products like Grvt Earn and Yield as Margin. If the platform can turn that activity into sustainable revenue, execute its intended monthly buybacks at the issuer’s discretion, and permanently remove purchased tokens from circulation, the combination could create a compelling token-economic model. The key distinction is that buybacks funded by sustainable business performance are more meaningful than token burns without a durable economic engine behind them. Over time, permanent burns can reduce both circulating supply and total supply. If demand remains strong or grows while supply contracts, that can create favorable conditions for the token’s value. Of course, none of this guarantees price appreciation. The real questions are how much revenue the business generates, how buybacks are funded, and whether user activity remains strong without excessive incentives. For me, that’s the Grvt thesis worth tracking: sustainable product usage, real economic activity, and a transparent mechanism for reducing token supply. Volume gets attention. Revenue creates the foundation. And disciplined token burns could help connect the two.