

and it's not only the LPs, in 6 hours of yesterday's volatility, 19.2% of uniswap's released fees never reached the burn: $320k went to builders and searchers different mechanism, same lesson: whenever an onchain price lags the market, bots collect the difference that's why @metricxyz anchors its pools to an oracle. the price moves with the market, so less is left on the table for bots and more goes to the LPs 🦊

burn vs budget is one leak, the bigger one is the LPs uniswap v3 LPs lost $35.6M to arb bots this year, even after fees (source @castle_labs ) @metricxyz prices its pools off an oracle. same ETH pool, same 11 days: LPs made +0.44 bps per $ traded there vs -1.01 on @Uniswap if you're going to provide the liquidity, you should be the one getting paid 🦊

pools of the day on @metricxyz 🐶 numbers on a $1k example, scale it to your size stocks tape is green so leaning stock - $TSLA : swap ~$620 into TSLAB, 1 bin left of the line + the line + 3 right - $SPCX : swap ~$440 into SPCXB, 2 left + the line + 2 right both green dot pools, exits on the card, skipping anything that reports this week till after the print

good read from @castle_labs on why Metric pools actually pay LPs @Uniswap v3 LPs lost $35.6M to arb bots this year even after fees, @metricxyz prices off an oracle so most of that loss goes away & each $1 in the pools does ~8x its size in daily volume their LP pick is the same one I run, green dot pool on a blue chip stock





