the 8 eth funder bundle on $BUN has just earned over 94 eth in fees and the position can't be sold.. > 11.8x recovery on the bundle > funders hold no tokens, only a claim on fees paid in eth 71% of $BUN supply still sits in agent vaults and it did this on a 0% creator fee, the slowest setting stop giving your money to bundled scams. a bundle that locks its supply and only earns when you trade is the one worth your attention @moshdottrade coins are built different
same chain, very different tax... 7d on robinhood chain: > @fomo: $51.4m volume, $165.9k fees (~0.32%) > @gmgnai: $30.5m volume, $302.7k fees (~0.99%) > @BasedBot : $13.1m, $56.3k > @MaestroBots : $2.9m, $24.4k gmgn does ~60% of fomo's volume and pulls ~1.8x the fees. worth knowing what you're paying per click.. which are you trading on?
whales hold 63% of the $NET float. highest share on the board, ahead of robinhood:0x39dbed3a2bd333467115de45665cc57f813c4571 (55%), robinhood:0x07ebb29a38fbcb41563817e5e19f2cec619c90d2 (51%) and cash-cat:native (50%) 26 wallets hold $490k of it. and they're still buying > +$40k net whale inflow in the last 24h > pons whales are down $777k and cashcat whales are down $241k over the same window > over 92% of supply is staked, so the tradable float is tiny and most of it sits with a few wallets > concentrated holders adding into a thin float are accumulating, not trading whales dont build a 63% position in a $775k market cap by accident. that's conviction (🥅,🥅)
i will keep hounding this until everyone takes notice. @moshdottrade tech can save the trenches! pumpfun ruined launches. every coin is bundled, sniped, run by serial devs and propped up by dodgy market makers mosh fixes the structure, not the symptoms. and @BundleCatAI is the proof.. 🔹 anti bundle: Mosh builds the bundle on purpose. funders crowdfund the opening buy and it locks in agent vaults. nobody can withdraw. funders get 80% of creator fees, not tokens, so they have nothing to dump. , 71% of bun supply still sits in the vaults 🔹 anti snipe: every @ponsdotfamily launch opens with a buy tax that starts at 99% and decays to 0 over 5 seconds. it isn't burned. it joins the fee pool. mosh also buys, graduates and adds liquidity in one transaction, so there is no window to front run. robinhood:0x07ebb29a38fbcb41563817e5e19f2cec619c90d2's 8 eth bundle was earned back inside the first minute 🔹 dodgy market makers: the agents are the market makers. they trade inside contract limits every period. the operator can sign trades but can't withdraw. a pause releases nothing. there is no hired mm to walk away 🔹 serial devs: any team cut is fixed on chain before the raise opens. bun launched with 0% 🔹 vamp attacks: copying a coin now means putting real capital into a bundle that locks for good. no refund after launch. funders only get paid if the token keeps trading, so a quick clone flip turns into a bad trade and it sits on top of pons. mosh doesn't fight it for launches. it plugs into the launchpad and is built to work with any other pad willing to integrate here is where it gets interesting: a market maker can make a token tradable. it can't make it wanted. you still need a community that gives people a reason to buy the difference is the structure finally works for you and not against you we deserve better launches. we deserve mosh robinhood:0x07ebb29a38fbcb41563817e5e19f2cec619c90d2 robinhood:0xb0788f5f65a9f4c0d8a634c45c391234f46221ab $CONV
trenches are ice cold rn... trench index sitting at 38 fewer runners, more vamps, and the dex volume confirms it: > solana: $9.2b on aug 27, $3.48b now (-62%) > robinhood chain: $3.78b on sep 4, $677m now (-82%) > hyperevm: $332m on aug 21, $62m now (-81%) solana held up best and still lost more than half. the newer chains gave back 4/5 of their peak in about 8 weeks but thats not even the craziest part: ➜ rh chain still printed 2,594 new tokens yesterday ➜ supply of coins isn't the problem. supply of buyers is every new vamp splits the same shrinking pool of degens a little thinner rest up. cold trenches are where the next runner gets built rh szn soon
cool to see @itsovercall running on chainlink price feeds every entry binds to a chainlink price report, so the path you trade is the path that actually happened... robinhood:0x6245db7f52379bd9757c9ddce6519768ffab3a4f
wait so there's a dex where the pool doesn't set its own price, lps never reset their ranges, and the market maker's update lands before the trade that hits it? that's @metricxyz... they call them "active pools" and it's live on ethereum, bsc and rh chain. here's how the pieces actually work: 1/ the price comes from outside the pool: > a "price provider" contract sets a bid, an ask and a reference price > it can read chainlink, pyth, or a market maker's own feed > trades only move price relative to that reference 2/ your liquidity follows the price on its own: > lps sit in bins, percentage ranges like +1% to +2% > reference goes $100 > $110, a pool sitting at +1.5% goes $101.50 > $111.65 > nobody traded. no withdraw, no redeposit 3/ the pool runner can't just rug the quote: > anchored pricing clamps every quote against an independent oracle > stoploss blocks any swap that takes a bin more than 15% below its peak > every pool gets a green, yellow or red badge based on what's locked 4/ makers stop getting picked off on ethereum: > updates stream to builders that make ~97-98% of blocks > a builder only includes your update when a trade hits your pool, placed ahead of it > no trade, no gas and traders pay zero fees on top. the cost sits inside the spread. now here's the part most people will skip... > the docs say it plainly: you can lose your entire deposit > their own example: $50 of fees becomes -$950 vs just holding after a 10% eth move > a red pool can be drained in one transaction imo the design makes a lot of sense for tokenised stocks, gold and forex, where the real price lives off-chain. there's even a multiplier oracle so robinhood stock tokens don't break on a split. but the whole system is only as good as its reference price. a lagging feed can make fees look great while lps quietly lose. i want to see how much tvl sits in green pools vs red ones, and whether aggregator flow actually shows up. if you want to use the dapp, here's my ref link: https://t.co/RXbitUdBoi
the magnet is doing its job... pearl is looking good here and i think its still got a long way to go. bitcoin miners solve sha-256 puzzles. @prlnet miners do matrix multiplication, the same math every neural net runs on the bull case: > fair launch. no premine, no founder allocation, no vc's. find me another 2026 L1 that can say that > 2.1b hard cap on a bitcoin fork. ceo is ex-nvidia, protocol came out of a peer reviewed 2025 paper > @togethercompute ($8b+) runs gemma-4 on pearl compute at 25%+ below market, subsidised by mining rewards > hashrate ~60 eh/s, up ~2.5x since june > base:0xed55c02068a89e764f9fa99d24baae0873f1bba3 up 38% on the week while the market fell 3.6%. aster/hyperliquid perps live, ticker moving to pearl-2:native the risk: it can't yet prove on-chain the work served paying AI customers, and ~1m new base:0xed55c02068a89e764f9fa99d24baae0873f1bba3 hits the market daily you're buying the option that GPU mining and AI inference become one market pearl-2:native ethereum:0x07696dcab55e62cfef953666b29fe1970518cb00
robinhood:0x6245db7f52379bd9757c9ddce6519768ffab3a4f survived a mass dump two weeks before mainnet and came back stronger. that's the part people missed the gmgn tourists unloaded in bulk, robinhood:0x6245db7f52379bd9757c9ddce6519768ffab3a4f absorbed it all and will break past ath soon. weak hands out before launch is the best setup you can ask for > one thing im looking forward to is using $USDG to play the channels. this is for robinhood:0x6245db7f52379bd9757c9ddce6519768ffab3a4f stakers only. > settlement vault seeded with 15% of supply, sitting in the vault, not on the market > float is only ~10% > stock channels on NVDA, TSLA, HOOD on the roadmap for the tradfi guys trade the path, not the direction. mainnet is today and most of CT still hasn't clicked a channel
