This is one campaign I'm genuinely looking forward to. @FungoLabs has officially launched its X Campaign with a reward pool of 300,000,000 $FUNGO For those unfamiliar with the project, FungoLabs is building encrypted NFTs on Ethereum using @zama 's FHEVM technology. FHE allows smart contracts to process encrypted data without exposing the underlying information, bringing privacy to onchain applications while keeping data usable. FungoLabs is an independent project building on Zama's technology. How to participate: ➦ Connect your X account on Fungo Campaign ➦ Submit your 5 best Fungo-related posts Campaign details: - Posts from November 1, 14:00 UTC onward count. - Leaderboard will be revealed after the campaign ends. - Rewards will be distributed at TGE. I've been keeping an eye on the Zama ecosystem, and seeing FungoLabs bring this technology into NFTs makes the campaign even more interesting. definitely one to keep on the radar

Things are moving fast with @hypestgg The preview brought in 25K+ players, and now the actual game is next. Phase 2 WL applications are officially closed. The eligibility checker drops tomorrow. - 2,222 seats. - 0.015 ETH. Mint is getting closer. Nov 3, 16:00 UTC.

November will be huge for NFTs…. Bookmark this... 👀

READY FOR UPVEMBER

Big congrats to everyone who won! @rarelistio is cooking lately, and the momentum just keeps getting stronger

every time @jackbutcher tweets about BALANCE, I'm on opensea in 0.01 nanoseconds checking if my NFT is finally tradable 😭😂

after the burn, the real test is product adoption 1.1M $GRVT bought on the open market and permanently burned, close to 1% of circulating supply at the time. a measurable, onchain reduction in supply from @grvt_io but one burn is a signal, not a verdict. future buybacks are intended monthly but remain discretionary. and the GRVT token confers no ownership, profit, or other economic rights. lasting demand has to come from usage. the metrics that matter next: ➦ new users joining the platform ➦ sustainable trading volume across crypto and stable funding perps ➦ retention beyond the initial grvt 2.0 launch ➦ real usage of grvt earn and yield as margin until these products launch and usage data becomes available, adoption remains an open question. a burn can lift sentiment. only sustained usage can support lasting demand. the real test is whether grvt can turn its roadmap into consistent usage, not just initial excitement the burn sent a signal now adoption has to prove the value

Early stage campaign alert 👀 @rarelistio is bringing @agentdojo into the creator ecosystem, where AI agents train, evolve, and battle. Live until Nov 06 🪂🪂

beyond crypto: @grvt_io 's expansion into stocks, fx, commodities and indices grvt currently supports around 200 crypto and real world asset perp markets. its target is 1,000+ markets by the end of december 2026 what's planned for stable funding perps: ➦ exposure to stocks, fx, commodities and indices ➦ zero trading fees ➦ once daily funding ➦ planned launch in november this is a target, not a result yet. listing markets is one thing. making them reliably tradable is another the real test will be: - liquidity depth across markets - price reliability, especially outside traditional market hours - spreads and execution quality during volatility 1,000 markets only matter if traders can actually use them

token burns get attention. but the numbers behind them deserve a closer look @grvt_io has completed its first buyback, purchasing and burning 1.1M $GRVT on the open market, nearly 1% of circulating supply at the time what i find interesting is the verification layer. - purchases are handled by an independent execution partner - the public dashboard tracks tokens bought, supply share, cumulative burns, and transaction hashes - future buybacks are intended monthly, but remain discretionary there’s an important distinction here buying tokens creates market activity. burning them permanently removes them from supply. the actual supply impact depends on what was bought, what was burned, and how circulating supply is measured. and even a verified burn doesn't guarantee price appreciation. demand and liquidity still matter. i'd pay more attention to consistent, verifiable execution over time than any single headline figure. that’s what i'll be watching as @grvt_io moves toward grvt 2.0.