I think we stop crypto adoption ourselves CT is great, we talk, learn from each other, exchange knowledge, and grow as a group. But our biggest issue is we can talk far too technical I know non technical people who aren't crypto natives, and when they read even my posts which I intentionally try to simplify, they have no clue what I'm talking about Simplicity is the key for spreading the benefits of crypto and we should all dumb down our language when talking to a wider audience That's not to say that we need to go full goo goo ga ga language, but a post every now and again with no jargon will go a long way

Bond yields are rising FAST because there's no demand for them. When there's no demand, the same bond gets sold for lower prices whilst promising the same return, hence making the yield higher. Demand is less because of wavering faith in the US being able to act good on those commitments. Why are bonds the default safe haven though ? They're the most liquid asset in the world, and have guaranteed APR, but with demand for bonds wavering we must look to what could be the next highly liquid, secure, and guaranteed yielding store of value..... $ETH !

I said it in June and now Tom Lee says it too The EF has to sell to fund operations, and it has a huge multiplier outcome on the ecosystem AND ITS SUSTAINABLE Couple that with them wanting to downsize into nothingness anyway to let the public take the reins and push Ethereum in any direction they want to. You can already see that happening with all the ETH nodes - ie. @ethlabs_org , @ethereuminsti

Heres are all the companies that got hacked this month : * MetaMask * ASOS * Siemens * John Deere * SharkNinja * Nikkei Inc. * GitLab * State Bank of India (SBI) * ConnectWise * Palo Alto Networks * Citizen Watch Guess who's not on the list? $ETH

Bottom signal is in, Arthur Hayes sold his $ETH The last time he sold his ETH we rallied to $4k+ range https://t.co/HdljHxEu3R

Starknet is going to become an L1 Let's see what happened last time and L2 made this mistake $DYDX: -95% in token price -79% in TVL -98% in volume -90% in revenue There's a big difference though, DYDX had users before transitioning, Starknet doesn't They only represent 0.32% of the total Ethereum ecosystem TVL

BMNR just staked another 160k $ETH to bring their total staked Eth to 5.227 million. Here's how much revenue that bags Tom Lee at different Eth prices : •$2,500 - $344M •$5,000 - $688M •$7,500 - $1.031B •$10,000 - $1.375B •$12,500 - $1.719B •$15,000 - $2.063B •$20,000 - $2.75B All that just for staking, a real life money printer !

Solana will beat Ethereum and that's why it's fighting for second place with an L2 Bro can't even beat out a subordinate of the Mainnet https://t.co/tkTpNyh7nl

Dilution has to be timed and going all out for cheap ETH made the most sense On the original plan, he would have slowly diluted $BMNR over 5 years, blunting upward movement and reducing ATHs for a prolonged period of time With the adjustment, you get diluted massively in one go during a bear market when your stock is going to be down anyways because you're a risky play with affiliation to crypto. So if you're stocks going to go low, might as well make it go lower for the opportunity it opens of buying cheap ETH before it's too late. And then this opens opportunity for a bigger rally upward when bull market kicks in

$BMNR dilution all makes sense now ! Tom Lee initially planned to buy the 5% over 5 years ! But he saw the opportunity of the bear market and did it in 1 That's why share price action was so bad, but it was a blip caused by excessive dilution to seize the opportunity at hand It wasn't meant to be a long term strategy and with the 5% alchemy almost completed, it won't sustain.