last week's @OndoPerps points just landed sitting at 13,415 now, with an average cost of around $0.10 per point honestly, I have no idea what these points will end up being worth but if we somehow get $0.50 per point, that's about $6.7K I'd be more than happy with that haha anyone else farming Ondo? curious what price you're hoping for

imagine having to move all your funds to a new wallet just because the old signature system is no longer safe. sounds like a nightmare lol. that's why I've been paying attention to @Starknet. Its accounts are smart contracts. Upgradeable wallets can switch to post-quantum signatures without changing addresses or waiting for a hard fork. Falcon-512 has already been tested on mainnet. but here's the catch. Starknet still depends on Ethereum for settlement, bridging and data availability. So the independent L1 idea actually makes sense to me. 93.52% voted to explore it. Not to launch it. Still a long way to go, but I'd rather see a chain working on the problem now than scrambling when quantum becomes a real threat.

Trading more just to save on fees? lol @OndoPerps is launching Fee Tiers on Nov 13. Your last 14 days of volume across Perps, Spot & Private Markets will decide your tier. Even trades made now count toward launch. Pretty solid for active traders. Just don't get cooked chasing a higher tier. Saving fees means nothing if you're overtrading.

Week 21 rewards from @OndoPerps 466.09 USDC. Appreciate it! The new referral points system adds another way to earn points during Season 1 Refer a trader and receive points equal to 5% of the points they earn from trading volume and OI ➥ Past referrals count retroactively ➥ No cap on the number of referred traders ➥ Referral points are extra to the weekly 5M points for traders One detail: the 5% applies to points, not USDC rewards. Eligibility and anti-wash checks also apply Looking forward to seeing how the rest of Season 1 plays out @Ondo #week21

#InfoFi is back @KaitoStudio_ is back @creator_wire is back Everyone suddenly believes in rewarding quality content again. 😂 So, @cookie3 , what's taking you so long? Image source: @Lexioryn https://t.co/M3aYz5xyJG

533,500 $XEF over 30 days is the headline. Being able to track and claim the rewards through @merkl_xyz is the part I appreciate. @Xeffy_io XAX Vault campaign adds token incentives on top of base yield for USDT depositors, with one place to follow the rewards. My order of research: strategy first, withdrawal terms second, incentives third. Extra rewards are welcome. But if the vault only looks attractive with the bonus, what happens when those 30 days end?

Your trading capital sits idle, earning nothing. Apparently, that's considered normal. @grvt_io wants to change that with Earn + Yield as Margin. ➥ Up to 11% APY on eligible assets, while also using them as trading collateral. Finally, capital that doesn't just sit around waiting for your next trade. Just don't mistake APY for a liquidation shield. A bad 20x trade can wipe out a year's yield in minutes. Still bullish on making idle capital work harder $GRVT

Launching a memecoin takes seconds. Keeping it alive for 48 hours is apparently a miracle. Pumpfun made creating tokens easy. Traders made loyalty extinct. Now a 2-day-old coin is called “dead” because a newer ticker just dropped. We wanted the next DOGE. We built a 24/7 exit liquidity factory.

The strongest case for a Starknet L1 is control over when security upgrades happen. A team can have replacement cryptography ready and still depend on another network to finish the job. @Starknet Quantum Hub shows where that happens: its normal blob data path uses Ethereum’s KZG commitments. Calldata offers a fallback, but bridge and messaging dependencies remain tied to Ethereum’s migration. For builders, that means their security roadmap includes decisions they don’t control. Hash-based STARK proofs and programmable accounts help Starknet adapt within its own stack. Exploring an independent L1 asks whether it should control more of that stack. I think that research is worth doing. But autonomy comes with responsibility: any proposal needs to explain how it would secure the functions Ethereum currently provides. That’s the test I’d apply: which dependencies disappear, what replaces them, and can users migrate safely? Starknet is preparing for quantum threats. Independence remains under exploration. Source: Quantum Hub and governance discussion, reviewed Oct 23, 2026. https://t.co/VIrUk0ToqH

A buyback won’t make someone switch trading platforms. But how it’s handled can matter to users deciding whether to hold the platform’s token. @grvt_io bought 1.1M ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf on the open market and permanently burned it, nearly 1% of circ. supply at purchase. For holders, the distinction is simple: those tokens can’t later be distributed as incentives or sold from a treasury. That specific amount is gone for good. The public dashboard also gives users something useful: a way to check purchases, cumulative burns and tx hashes themselves. Future updates can be compared with an actual record. That makes GRVT easier to evaluate. A user considering ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf can look at what the issuer has executed, instead of putting full weight on future promises. Further buybacks are intended monthly, at the issuer’s discretion. There’s no fixed monthly amount, and a burn doesn’t guarantee price gains. My bullish takeaway is the accountability. GRVT 2.0 starts with a completed action that holders can verify and track over time. That’s a stronger basis for earning their attention and trust.