Fractal第一次减半，共销毁4,275,161枚FB。
其中约219.6万枚来自剩余的Index Mining早期奖励，57.9万枚来自公开测试奖励，150万枚来自第二年生态金库，记录都能在链上查到。
看到烧币，散户很容易觉得价格该涨了。FB目前却只有0.31美元左右，24小时跌约9%，近7天跌15.5%，近30天跌22.4%。同期BTC还在反弹，说明FB自身买盘偏弱。
这次销毁没有经过二级市场回购，处理的主要是尚未发放的额度。它减少了未来供应，没有带来新的买入资金。
销毁量约占最大供应的2%。减半后每30秒仍会产生25枚FB，每天约7.2万枚，一年约2628万枚，相当于这次销毁量的6倍左右。
官方数据显示，目前约1.096亿枚FB已经流通，还有45.7%尚未流通。Index Mining质押约1260万枚FB，锁住部分流通量，质押奖励也会产生新的卖盘。
这次销毁方向没问题，供应压力确实少了一部分。价格想起来，还得看Fractal能不能带来更多用户、交易和资金，把每天新增的FB接住。
UniSat花20万U，买了541,944枚FB，均价0.369U。
有买盘是好事，占流通盘约0.49%，而且回购后没有销毁，是拿去做质押和Index Mining。
我觉得FB可以小仓位玩，但还不到重仓的时候。
剩下4个月继续买，Fractal的用户、成交量和手续费也能跟上，这个币才有东西。只靠一次20万U回购，拉不动多久。
There’s been a lot of discussion around wallet security lately, and I actually think UniSat taking the time to explain mnemonic security in detail was necessary.
A lot of people instinctively ask the same question:
Are 12 words no longer safe?Should everyone just switch to 24 words?
But that’s not really the core issue.
Under BIP-39, a 12-word mnemonic is generated from 128 bits of entropy, while a 24-word mnemonic uses 256 bits. There’s also checksum data included, but that doesn’t add extra randomness.
What matters isn’t just the number of words.
It’s whether the entropy was generated securely, whether the wallet implementation is sound, and whether the mnemonic itself has ever been exposed.
The same goes for a BIP-39 passphrase.
It doesn’t magically turn a 12-word mnemonic into a “higher-entropy mnemonic.” It works as an additional input when deriving the seed. Used properly, it adds another layer of protection. Used carelessly, it becomes another critical secret you can’t afford to lose.
That’s why I don’t see UniSat’s update as just another wallet version update.
Whenever the industry gets hit by security incidents, the conversation eventually comes back to the boring fundamentals: randomness, private keys, mnemonics, and implementation quality.
Nobody talks much about them during the hype.
Until something bre
