Coin Bureau's co-founder said publicly that the quantum threat to Bitcoin is 90% marketing and 10% imminent risk. At least a decade away. Nothing to act on. That take is aging badly in real time. Six months ago the physical qubit floor for breaking ECC was 100,000. Oratomic's paper in March pushed it to 10,000. The largest neutral-atom array demonstrated sits at 6,100. Citi published a research note this quarter warning institutional investors to monitor the timeline. The Ethereum Foundation co-authored the paper that revised the attack surface against its own chain. Project Eleven put Q-Day at 2030 in a 110-page analysis that no serious cryptographer has publicly disputed. The "decade away" framing made sense against the old qubit estimates. It does not make sense against the current ones. The gap between current hardware and cryptographic relevance is now measured in thousands of qubits, not orders of magnitude. @QuipNetwork's WOTS+ vault is live on EVM, SVM, Base, and Optimism. Hash-based signatures with no known quantum attack vector, deployed before the consensus formed on whether to take the threat seriously. Mainnet Q2. The 10% of total QUIP supply allocated to vault depositors is weighted by value and duration. I might be wrong that the window is as tight as the data suggests. But "90% marketing" is not a risk model. It is a posture.