Galaxy Digital and Bitgo Face Legal Dispute Over Failed $1.2 Billion Merger

iconBitcoin.com
Share
Share IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconCopy
AI summary iconSummary

expand icon
Galaxy Digital and Bitgo are in a Delaware Chancery Court trial over a failed $1.2 billion merger from 2021. Bitgo is seeking at least $100 million in damages, claiming Galaxy Digital terminated the deal without justification. Galaxy argues it had a valid right to terminate due to Bitgo’s failure to meet financial disclosure requirements. The case was revived in May 2024 after the Delaware Supreme Court found ambiguity in the merger agreement's terms. Testimonies from Galaxy founder Mike Novogratz and Bitgo CEO Mike Belshe are ongoing. A final ruling is expected from Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick. This case is a major development in digital asset news and could impact the digital collectibles news space as well.

Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz and Bitgo CEO Mike Belshe testified this week in Delaware Chancery Court over a failed $1.2 billion merger that collapsed in 2022, with Bitgo seeking at least $100 million in damages.

  • Key Takeaways:

    • Bitgo is seeking at least $100 million from Galaxy Digital over a failed 2021 merger worth $1.2 billion.
    • Galaxy’s Mike Novogratz testified this week that U.S. regulatory probes did not affect the merger’s approval path.
    • Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick will decide the case after Delaware’s Supreme Court revived it in May 2024.
  • Bitgo CEO Mike Belshe Challenges Galaxy Digital’s 2022 Merger Termination in Court

    The case traces back to May 2021, when Galaxy Digital Holdings agreed to acquire Bitgo Holdings, a crypto custody and security firm. At the time, it was dubbed the largest deal in crypto industry history.

    Galaxy terminated the agreement in August 2022. The company cited Bitgo’s failure to deliver audited financial statements for the fiscal year 2021 in a form that met the contractual standard. New U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff accounting guidance had complicated crypto-related filings, and Galaxy maintained it had a clean termination right with no fee owed.

    Bitgo disputed that position. According to Bloomberg, CEO Mike Belshe testified that Bitgo provided the required documentation and that Galaxy’s termination claims caused direct harm to the company. Bitgo is seeking at least the $100 million reverse breakup fee written into the merger agreement, and argues actual damages may exceed that figure.

    “This was incredibly damaging,” Belshe is cited as saying in court, according to Bloomberg’s Sabrina Willmer.

    Novogratz addressed several issues during his testimony. He stated that U.S. regulatory inquiries did not target Galaxy directly and had no bearing on the merger’s regulatory approval path. He also discussed Galaxy’s Luna trading profits of nearly $400 million, saying those sales were made to reduce risk.

    Bitgo alleges Galaxy failed to use reasonable efforts to close the deal. The company also claims Galaxy withheld details of government inquiries that could have affected regulatory approvals, including potential SEC concerns tied to Galaxy’s activities. Bitgo contends Galaxy walked away after the deal became financially unattractive as crypto markets declined.

    The legal path has been anything but direct. Bitgo filed suit in the Delaware Chancery Court in 2022. Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster dismissed the case in June 2023, ruling Galaxy had a valid termination right because Bitgo’s financial statements did not comply with the agreement’s terms.

    The Delaware Supreme Court reversed that ruling in May 2024. Justices found the merger agreement’s definition of “financial statements” was ambiguous and that both sides offered reasonable interpretations. The case was sent back to the lower court.

    Proceedings have continued since, including discovery disputes. The trial before Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick is now underway. No final ruling has been issued as of May 23, 2026.

    The outcome rests on several issues: whether Galaxy met its contractual obligation to pursue the deal in good faith, whether Bitgo’s financial statements satisfied the agreement’s terms, and whether Galaxy had a disclosure obligation related to regulatory inquiries.

    Possible outcomes include Galaxy paying the $100 million termination fee, a larger damages award, a settlement between the parties, or a ruling in Galaxy’s favor. The court, not a jury, will decide.

    Despite the litigation, the two companies have collaborated on other initiatives, including staking. That detail has done little to resolve the core dispute over what happened to one of crypto’s biggest proposed deals.

    The case is filed under C.A. No. 2022-0808 in the Delaware Chancery Court.

    Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.